535 research outputs found
Implementation in Advised Strategies: Welfare Guarantees from Posted-Price Mechanisms When Demand Queries Are NP-Hard
State-of-the-art posted-price mechanisms for submodular bidders with
items achieve approximation guarantees of [Assadi and
Singla, 2019]. Their truthfulness, however, requires bidders to compute an
NP-hard demand-query. Some computational complexity of this form is
unavoidable, as it is NP-hard for truthful mechanisms to guarantee even an
-approximation for any [Dobzinski and
Vondr\'ak, 2016]. Together, these establish a stark distinction between
computationally-efficient and communication-efficient truthful mechanisms.
We show that this distinction disappears with a mild relaxation of
truthfulness, which we term implementation in advised strategies, and that has
been previously studied in relation to "Implementation in Undominated
Strategies" [Babaioff et al, 2009]. Specifically, advice maps a tentative
strategy either to that same strategy itself, or one that dominates it. We say
that a player follows advice as long as they never play actions which are
dominated by advice. A poly-time mechanism guarantees an -approximation
in implementation in advised strategies if there exists poly-time advice for
each player such that an -approximation is achieved whenever all
players follow advice. Using an appropriate bicriterion notion of approximate
demand queries (which can be computed in poly-time), we establish that (a
slight modification of) the [Assadi and Singla, 2019] mechanism achieves the
same -approximation in implementation in advised
strategies
On Simultaneous Two-player Combinatorial Auctions
We consider the following communication problem: Alice and Bob each have some
valuation functions and over subsets of items,
and their goal is to partition the items into in a way that
maximizes the welfare, . We study both the allocation
problem, which asks for a welfare-maximizing partition and the decision
problem, which asks whether or not there exists a partition guaranteeing
certain welfare, for binary XOS valuations. For interactive protocols with
communication, a tight 3/4-approximation is known for both
[Fei06,DS06].
For interactive protocols, the allocation problem is provably harder than the
decision problem: any solution to the allocation problem implies a solution to
the decision problem with one additional round and additional bits of
communication via a trivial reduction. Surprisingly, the allocation problem is
provably easier for simultaneous protocols. Specifically, we show:
1) There exists a simultaneous, randomized protocol with polynomial
communication that selects a partition whose expected welfare is at least
of the optimum. This matches the guarantee of the best interactive, randomized
protocol with polynomial communication.
2) For all , any simultaneous, randomized protocol that
decides whether the welfare of the optimal partition is or correctly with probability requires
exponential communication. This provides a separation between the attainable
approximation guarantees via interactive () versus simultaneous () protocols with polynomial communication.
In other words, this trivial reduction from decision to allocation problems
provably requires the extra round of communication
Condorcet-Consistent and Approximately Strategyproof Tournament Rules
We consider the manipulability of tournament rules for round-robin
tournaments of competitors. Specifically, competitors are competing for
a prize, and a tournament rule maps the result of all
pairwise matches (called a tournament, ) to a distribution over winners.
Rule is Condorcet-consistent if whenever wins all of her matches,
selects with probability .
We consider strategic manipulation of tournaments where player might
throw their match to player in order to increase the likelihood that one of
them wins the tournament. Regardless of the reason why chooses to do this,
the potential for manipulation exists as long as increases by
more than decreases. Unfortunately, it is known that every
Condorcet-consistent rule is manipulable (Altman and Kleinberg). In this work,
we address the question of how manipulable Condorcet-consistent rules must
necessarily be - by trying to minimize the difference between the increase in
and decrease in for any potential manipulating
pair.
We show that every Condorcet-consistent rule is in fact -manipulable,
and that selecting a winner according to a random single elimination bracket is
not -manipulable for any . We also show that many
previously studied tournament formats are all -manipulable, and the
popular class of Copeland rules (any rule that selects a player with the most
wins) are all in fact -manipulable, the worst possible. Finally, we consider
extensions to match-fixing among sets of more than two players.Comment: 20 page
Reducing Revenue to Welfare Maximization: Approximation Algorithms and other Generalizations
It was recently shown in [http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.5518] that revenue
optimization can be computationally efficiently reduced to welfare optimization
in all multi-dimensional Bayesian auction problems with arbitrary (possibly
combinatorial) feasibility constraints and independent additive bidders with
arbitrary (possibly combinatorial) demand constraints. This reduction provides
a poly-time solution to the optimal mechanism design problem in all auction
settings where welfare optimization can be solved efficiently, but it is
fragile to approximation and cannot provide solutions to settings where welfare
maximization can only be tractably approximated. In this paper, we extend the
reduction to accommodate approximation algorithms, providing an approximation
preserving reduction from (truthful) revenue maximization to (not necessarily
truthful) welfare maximization. The mechanisms output by our reduction choose
allocations via black-box calls to welfare approximation on randomly selected
inputs, thereby generalizing also our earlier structural results on optimal
multi-dimensional mechanisms to approximately optimal mechanisms. Unlike
[http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.5518], our results here are obtained through novel
uses of the Ellipsoid algorithm and other optimization techniques over {\em
non-convex regions}
Matroid prophet inequalities and Bayesian mechanism design
Thesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 2012.Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.Includes bibliographical references (p. 42-44).Consider a gambler who observes a sequence of independent, non-negative random numbers and is allowed to stop the sequence at any time, claiming a reward equal to the most recent observation. The famous prophet inequality of Krengel, Sucheston, and Garling asserts that a gambler who knows the distribution of each random variable can achieve at least half as much reward, in expectation, as a "prophet" who knows the sampled values of each random variable and can choose the largest one. We generalize this result to the setting in which the gambler and the prophet are allowed to make more than one selection, subject to a matroid constraint. We show that the gambler can still achieve at least half as much reward as the prophet; this result is the best possible, since it is known that the ratio cannot be improved even in the original prophet inequality, which corresponds to the special case of rank-one matroids. Generalizing the result still further, we show that under an intersection of p matroid constraints, the prophet's reward exceeds the gambler's by a factor of at most 0(p), and this factor is also tight. Beyond their interest as theorems about pure online algoritms or optimal stopping rules, these results also have applications to mechanism design. Our results imply improved bounds on the ability of sequential posted-price mechanisms to approximate optimal mechanisms in both single-parameter and multi-parameter Bayesian settings. In particular, our results imply the first efficiently computable constant-factor approximations to the Bayesian optimal revenue in certain multi-parameter settings. This work was done in collaboration with Robert Kleinberg.by S. Matthew Weinberg.S.M
Prophet Inequalities with Limited Information
In the classical prophet inequality, a gambler observes a sequence of
stochastic rewards and must decide, for each reward ,
whether to keep it and stop the game or to forfeit the reward forever and
reveal the next value . The gambler's goal is to obtain a constant
fraction of the expected reward that the optimal offline algorithm would get.
Recently, prophet inequalities have been generalized to settings where the
gambler can choose items, and, more generally, where he can choose any
independent set in a matroid. However, all the existing algorithms require the
gambler to know the distribution from which the rewards are
drawn.
The assumption that the gambler knows the distribution from which
are drawn is very strong. Instead, we work with the much simpler
assumption that the gambler only knows a few samples from this distribution. We
construct the first single-sample prophet inequalities for many settings of
interest, whose guarantees all match the best possible asymptotically,
\emph{even with full knowledge of the distribution}. Specifically, we provide a
novel single-sample algorithm when the gambler can choose any elements
whose analysis is based on random walks with limited correlation. In addition,
we provide a black-box method for converting specific types of solutions to the
related \emph{secretary problem} to single-sample prophet inequalities, and
apply it to several existing algorithms. Finally, we provide a constant-sample
prophet inequality for constant-degree bipartite matchings.
We apply these results to design the first posted-price and multi-dimensional
auction mechanisms with limited information in settings with asymmetric
bidders
- …